Elliott Abrams, the chief envoy of the United States to Venezuela, said the United States was urging India to stop buying Venezuelan oil. Venezuelan oil is the main source of revenue for the Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro’s government. Meanwhile, the Trump administration this week threatened to impose more sanctions on Venezuela to cut off Maduro’s financial lifeline.
Elliott Abrams said that instead of helping the regime, you should stand by the Venezuelan people. The Trump government has conveyed the same message to other governments and has made similar views to foreign banks and private enterprises that have business with the Maduro government.
Under pressure from India, the United States and its regional allies supporting Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaido threatened to impose more sanctions to cut off Maduro’s government’s revenue stream and force him to step down.
Washington regards Guaido as Venezuela’s legitimate leader, imposes sanctions on the country’s oil industry, and announces asset freezes and travel bans on senior Venezuelan government officials.
The Indian market is crucial to Venezuela’s economy because historically, India has been the second largest cash payment customer for crude oil in the OPEC country, after the United States. By imposing sanctions on Maduro, the United States handed over most of its revenue to Guaido.
Oil shipments to China, another major importer of Venezuela, cannot generate cash because they will be used to repay billions of dollars in loans from the Chinese government to the Venezuelan government.
The talks on Venezuela came as trade tensions between the United States and India intensified and the United States urged India to stop buying Iranian oil.
The United States plans to end preferential trade treatment with India. This preferential treatment allows duty-free imports of $5.6 billion worth of goods exported by India to the United States.
U.S. sanctions usually prevent U.S. companies from doing business with specific foreign governments or companies.
Seeking to prevent India from buying Venezuelan crude oil will be part of the so-called “secondary sanctions” strategy. In this strategy, Washington will punish companies that are not in the United States.
This strategy, and even the threat of using it, is crucial in Washington’s campaign to cut off pressure on Iran’s fiscal revenues. But it has also attracted criticism from foreign governments that the United States should not impose its policy decisions on companies in other countries.
John Bolton, the U.S. national security adviser, warned foreign banks this week that they might be subject to U.S. sanctions for hiding Venezuelan assets.
An Indian official said that the United States and India would hold diplomatic consultations in Washington next week to discuss whether India would agree to stop buying Venezuelan oil. He added that India “knows very well the position of the United States on Venezuela”.
Venezuela’s oil minister, Manuel Quevedo, attended a meeting in New Delhi in mid-February to seek to “double” its crude oil exports to India and increase Venezuela’s imports of refined products from India. He also said he was open to barter payments.
But Venezuela’s exports to India have remained relatively stable this month since the Trump government imposed sanctions on Venezuela’s state-owned oil company (PDVSA), which means Venezuela’s exports to India are far from enough to offset the decline in U.S. exports.
According to Refinitiv Eikon, Venezuela exported 297,000 barrels of crude oil directly to India every day in February, excluding crude oil first shipped to other ports such as Singapore or Rotterdam. India imported 342,000 barrels per day of Venezuelan crude oil in January, compared with an average of 340,000 barrels per day last year. This is far below India’s average daily imports of more than 400,000 barrels in the past, and is not enough to compensate for the drop in February imports from more than 500,000 barrels before the sanctions to 104,800 barrels.
India is also under pressure from members of the two major U.S. political parties. Republican Senator Marco Rubio said on Twitter February 13 that the purchase of Venezuelan oil by Reliance Petroleum, an Indian refiner, would undermine Guaido’s “legitimate government” and “lead to calls for a second sanction against Reliance Petroleum of India”.
Albio Sires, chairman of the Western Hemisphere Subcommittee of the United States House of Representatives, wrote to the Indian Ambassador to Washington on February 12, expressing concern that Venezuela “tried to bypass the efforts of the United States, hold Maduro accountable and engage with one of our strongest partners in the process”.
In an interview at the end of February, Democrat Sires said: “We will start lobbying to see if India can stop buying oil from Venezuela.
Data show that Venezuelan oil accounted for only 4.2% of India’s total oil imports in January. Mooses Rendon of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington said Venezuela, like other major buyers such as Russia, was not a priority for India’s foreign policy.
“The United States has enough influence to get India out of its relationship with Venezuela,” Rendon said. That’s why America’s role here is crucial. ”